Sound masking. Cycling music. AI automation. Built without dark patterns.Get in touch
Feb 22, 2026 · 8 min read

Why production companies are moving from spreadsheets to centralized software

Most film and media production teams still coordinate across spreadsheets, email threads, and shared drives. Here is why that breaks down at scale, and what centralized production management looks like.

Film and media production is one of the most coordination-intensive industries that exists. A single shoot involves dozens of crew members, location permits, equipment rentals, insurance documents, call sheets, compliance requirements across jurisdictions, and logistics that change daily. And most production companies manage all of it with some combination of spreadsheets, email threads, shared Google Drives, and WhatsApp groups.

It works until it does not. And when it stops working, the consequences are expensive: missed permits, double-booked crew, expired insurance discovered on the day of a shoot, or compliance gaps that surface during an audit.


How most production teams actually operate

Talk to any line producer or production coordinator and you will hear a familiar pattern. The master schedule lives in a spreadsheet. Call sheets go out by email. Contracts and permits sit in a shared drive with folder names like "FINAL v3 ACTUALLY FINAL." Crew availability is tracked through a mix of text messages and calendar invites. Compliance documents are scattered across inboxes.

Each of these systems works in isolation. The problem is that production is not a collection of isolated tasks. It is a web of dependencies. When a location changes, that affects the call sheet, which affects crew assignments, which affects transport logistics, which affects the equipment list. In a spreadsheet-and-email workflow, every change triggers a cascade of manual updates across multiple tools, and every manual update is a chance for something to fall through.

The visibility problem

The deeper issue is not any single tool failing. It is the lack of a unified view across the entire production. When information lives in six different places, no one person can see the full picture without spending hours pulling it together manually.

Producers waste time chasing status updates. Coordinators spend their days cross-referencing documents. Department heads make decisions based on information that might be hours or days out of date.

This is not a technology problem in the traditional sense. Production teams are not lacking tools. They are lacking a single system that connects those tools into something coherent.

The compliance gap

Compliance is where scattered systems become genuinely risky. Film productions routinely work across multiple jurisdictions, each with different labour regulations, permit requirements, insurance minimums, and safety standards.

When compliance documents are spread across email attachments and shared folders, tracking what is current, what is expiring, and what is missing requires manual audits that nobody has time for during active production. The result is that compliance gaps only surface when something goes wrong, which is exactly when you cannot afford them.


What centralized production management actually means

Centralized production management is not about replacing every tool a production team uses. It is about creating a single platform where the critical information lives and stays connected.

One dashboard for scheduling

Crew scheduling, call sheets, and availability all live in one place. When a schedule changes, the downstream effects are visible immediately. Department heads see their own team's assignments without waiting for an email update. For companies running overlapping shoots, centralized crew scheduling is what makes this possible.

One system for documents

Contracts, permits, insurance certificates, and production documents are stored centrally with version tracking. When a document is updated, everyone sees the current version. When a permit expires, the system knows.

One view for compliance

Compliance requirements are tracked by jurisdiction, by production, and by status. What is current, what is expiring, and what needs attention is visible at a glance instead of buried in folder structures.

One place for logistics

Equipment, transport, and location logistics are managed alongside the schedule and crew assignments they depend on. Changes in one area flow through to the others.


Why off-the-shelf tools fall short

There are project management tools. There are document management tools. There are scheduling tools. But production companies have learned that generic tools require significant customization to fit production workflows, and that customization is fragile.

A project management tool designed for software development does not understand call sheets. A document management system built for legal firms does not track permit expiry dates by jurisdiction. A scheduling tool designed for shift work does not handle the reality that a grip might be booked on three different productions in the same week with different call times.

Production workflows are specific enough that generic tools always require workarounds, and workarounds are where things break.

Custom-built vs. adapted

The alternative is software designed from the ground up around how production actually works. Not a generic platform with production-specific templates bolted on, but a system where crew scheduling, document management, compliance tracking, and logistics are integrated because they were designed together.

This is the approach Siasola Production Management takes. The platform is shaped by real production workflows: discovery sessions with production teams, observation of how coordination actually happens day to day, and iterative development that responds to how the tool performs under real conditions.


The shift is already happening

Production companies are increasingly recognizing that the spreadsheet-and-email approach has a ceiling. As productions scale, as compliance requirements grow more complex, and as the cost of coordination failures increases, the case for centralized production management becomes harder to ignore.

The companies making this shift are not doing it because they want new technology. They are doing it because they need visibility, accountability, and the ability to manage complex productions without depending on one coordinator who keeps everything in their head.


Getting started

If you are running a production company and recognize these problems, the first step is understanding your own workflows clearly enough to know what a centralized system needs to do. Every production company operates differently, and the right software reflects those differences rather than forcing you into a generic mould.

Contact us through our contact form at siasola.com/contact to discuss your production workflows. We will scope the platform around your specific needs and provide a clear timeline for delivery.

Justin, founder of siasola

Justin

Founder of siasola

BSc Computer Science, graduate studies in machine learning / AI, 12 years of music training. Building AI automation and apps for good.

Learn more about siasola Production Management

Explore

Ready to try siasola Production Management?

Get notified